Archive for June 2nd, 2009

PhotobucketObama remains mum on the cold blooded murder of an American soldier Pvt. William Long and the wounding of another Pvt. Quinton Ezeagwula. Victims of  jihad at the hands of an American Muslim convert on US soil, Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad.

Why no official WH or DOJ statement? By Obama or at least one of his lackey’s? What is his malfunction? Has he been to busy with an abortionist’s death (shocked and outraged – heinous acts of violence – absolutely disheartening) and handing out LGBT month?

Nuke Gingrich

The Washington Times said it best … “It’s a sad day in America when the shooting of an abortion doctor stops the presses but no one notices two soldiers gunned down by an Islamist.”

His silence speaks volumes.

The One not saying it out loud does not make it disappear. It is an insult to all of our brave Military men and women who sacrifice themselves to defend this great country and it’s citizens. Where is the respect? He has not even tried to fake it. Not a peep. No -”shocked and outraged – heinous acts of violence – or an absolutely disheartening”.

Not one word from the One.

He is a disgrace.

My friend jhilborn at Twitter has a theory.

Would not be conducive with bringing Gitmo terrorists to US.

Why of course that could be it!

Obama has also been preparing to collectively kiss the ass of the entire Muslim world. An affair of utmost importance. Should be quite the little soiree. Black tie optional, brown nose & bended knee a must. He wouldn’t want to ruffle any Islamic feathers as a prelude to his trip. Doesn’t want to get off on the wrong foot.

Come to think of it I do not recall a statement by Obama on the terrorist group arrested in NY either. Please correct me if I am wrong.

Update:
Whomever is responsible for this ludicrous policy may have been a catalyst that led to the death of Pvt. William Long.

Stratfor Research

However, politics have proved obstructive to all facets of counterterrorism policy. And politics may have been at play in the Muhammad case as well as in other cases involving Black Muslim converts. Several weeks ago, STRATFOR heard from sources that the FBI and other law enforcement organizations had been ordered to “back off” of counterterrorism investigations into the activities of Black Muslim converts. At this point, it is unclear to us if that guidance was given by the White House or the Department of Justice, or if it was promulgated by the agencies themselves, anticipating the wishes of President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder.

As STRATFOR has previously noted, the FBI has a culture that is very conservative and risk-averse. Many FBI supervisors are reluctant to authorize investigations that they believe may have negative blow-back on their career advancement. In light of this institutional culture, and the order to be careful in investigations relating to Black Muslim converts, it would not be at all surprising to us if a supervisor refused to authorize a full-field investigation of Muhammad that would have included surveillance of his activities. Though in practical terms, even if a full-field investigation had been authorized, due to the caution being exercised in cases related to Black Muslim converts, the case would most likely have been micromanaged to the point of inaction by the special agent in charge of the office involved or by FBI headquarters.

H/T Doug Ross via Larwyn

And then there is this.

Pvt. Long’s assassin roamed free because of “insufficient evidence” for wiretaps/investigation

The bad guy has all this, has been in the hands of the FBI and set loose with no ability to scrutinize him closer. Meanwhile, two of America’s finest, ready to serve, are on the streets and unable to carry a weapon with our nation’s laws.

Something is seriously wrong with this picture.

Just what does it take within US law to be able to track a domestic jihadi? No wiretaps or surveillance allowable? Is it that we must just wait until he, in his cowardice, cuts down unarmed American soldiers in a southern town’s parking lot?

Update 2:

The  White House  finally issued a statement regarding Pvt. William Long’s murder. “Feds: Muhammad May Have Had Other Targets”

A joint FBI (web) -Homeland Security intelligence assessment obtained by The Associated Press said officers found maps to Jewish organizations, a child care center, a Baptist church, a post office and military recruiting centers in the southeastern U.S. and New York and Philadelphia.

Muslim-convert Abdulhakim Muhammad has pleaded not guilty to Monday’s deadly shooting in a suburban Little Rock shopping center. Authorities said he targeted soldiers “because of what they had done to Muslims in the past.”

Meanwhile, in a statement released by the White House Wednesday, President Obama said, “I am deeply saddened by this senseless act of violence against two brave young soldiers who were doing their part to strengthen our armed forces and keep our country safe. I would like to wish Quinton Ezeagwula a speedy recovery, and to offer my condolences and prayers to William Long’s family as they mourn the loss of their son.”

Obama Quietly Issues Statement on Terrorist Attack in Arkansas

After two days of silence, President Obama issued a statement Wednesday on the shooting of two U.S. soldiers by a Muslim militant in Arkansas–but the White House didn’t even email the statement to its list of national reporters. Rather, the White House appears to have quietly released this statement to a local AP bureau in Arkansas

[snip]

The contrast between Obama’s statements is striking: He’s “deeply saddened” by the murder of a U.S. soldier, but “shocked and outraged” by the murder of an abortionist? The murder of a U.S. soldier is a “senseless” act of violence but the murder of an abortionist is a “heinous” act of violence?

Obama musters up moral outrage to denounce the wicked deed committed in Kansas, but seems almost resigned to the tragedy or “man-caused disaster” that occurred in Arkansas.

H/T  WinkyDog

The terror tie plot thickens…
Exclusive: FBI Probes Muhammad’s Ties to Ohio Mosque
FBI Wants to Know If Ohio Mosque Has Link to Terror

Nuradin Abdi was convicted in 2007 of planning to blow up an Ohio shopping mall.

Iyman Faris was convicted in 2003 of planning to blow up the Brooklyn Bridge.

Christopher Paul was convicted in 2008 of conspiring to use explosives against targets in the U.S. and Europe.

All three terrorists worshiped and socialized at a small mosque in Columbus, Ohio, and, according to David B. Smith, an attorney for Faris, were part of a larger group of jihadists and extremists who frequented the mosque.

The FBI now is investigating reports of links to that same mosque by Muslim-convert Abdulhakim Muhammad who allegedly shot and killed one soldier Monday and critically wounded another in a drive-by attack on a Little Rock, Ark., recruiting station, ABC News has learned.

According to law enforcement sources, they have received reports that Muhammad appears to have attended the mosque during a period from 2006 to 2007 when evidence indicates he resided in Columbus. It is unclear what, if any, links he had to the individuals already convicted.

However, his possible links to the mosque are one promising avenue under investigation as the government attempts to reconstruct Muhammad’s path to radicalization and to establish firmly whether he acted alone in the recruiting station shooting. [...]

Note:  I do not in any way shape or form condone the killing of George Tiller. I have stated that from the beginning.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 5 Comments »

Imagine if you will  members of the KKK being official “poll watchers” for the GOP intimidating black voters at polling stations. And getting away with it. Can we say cold day in hell? “Yes we can”

When confronted by Philadelphia Police, Black Panther Jerry Jackson stated  that he was “an official watcher” – meaning that he had been appointed by a party or candidate to observe the election at the polling location.

[snip]

We already reported here that Jackson is an elected member of the Philadelphia Democratic Committee.  And a document obtained from the Philadelphia Board of Elections confirms he was “representing the Democratic Party” at the polls in November.  

Here is a copy of the watcher certificate he was issued and below is  some of his “official” activity.
Photobucket
From the complaint that was spiked by DOJ:

Read the rest at Election Journal

Not only have the New Black Panther Party (for all intents and purposes) been officially endorsed by the Obama admin’s Department of Justice. One of the defendants  is an official rep for the Democratic Party.

When will ENOUGH be ENOUGH?

Is this the United States of America or a Banana Republic?

Hellooooo MSM I can’t hear you.

The back story:

[...]The three black panthers, Minister King Samir Shabazz, Malik Zulu Shabazz and Jerry Jackson were charged in a civil complaint in the final days of the Bush administration with violating the voter rights act by using coercion, threats and intimidation. Shabazz allegedly held a nightstick or baton that prosecutors said he pointed at people and menacingly tapped it. Prosecutors also say he “supports racially motivated violence against non-blacks and Jews.”

The Obama administration won the case last month, but moved to dismiss the charges on May 15.

The complaint says the men hurled racial slurs at both blacks and whites.

A poll watcher who provided an affidavit to prosecutors in the case noted that Bartle Bull, who worked as a civil rights lawyer in the south in the 1960’s and is a former campaign manager for Robert Kennedy, said it was the most blatant form of voter intimidation he had ever seen.

In his affidavit, obtained by FOX News, Bull wrote “I watched the two uniformed men confront voters and attempt to intimidate voters. They were positioned in a location that forced every voter to pass in close proximity to them. The weapon was openly displayed and brandished in plain sight of voters.”

He also said they tried to “interfere with the work of other poll observers … whom the uniformed men apparently believed did not share their preferences politically,” noting that one of the panthers turned toward the white poll observers and said “you are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker.”[...]

The New Black Panther Party, Obama admin endorsed jackboots in action during election 2008.


Link @YouTube

These thugs have gotten off scot-free.

All Americans should be outraged at this blatant miscarriage of justice.

Democrats the Obama admin,  allow obvious “voter intimidation” Yet in the past have suggested….

Right Michigan

Page 54, section 2 in the 2004 Democratic National Committee “Election Day Manual (pdf)” to be specific.  It reads, in part:
2. If no signs of intimidation techniques have emerged yet, launch a “pre-emptive strike” (particularly well-suited to states in which there techniques have been tried in the past).

# Issue a press release

i. Reviewing Republican tactic used in the past in your area or state

ii. Quoting party/minority/civil rights leadership as denouncing tactics that discourage people from voting

# Prime minority leadership to discuss the issue in the media; provide talking points

# Place stories in which minority leadership expresses concern about the threat of intimidation tactics

# Warn local newspapers not to accept advertising that is not properly disclaimed or that contains false warnings about voting requirements and/or about what will happen at the polls

Justified Right

In other words, the DNC told poll workers to mislead the world into thinking the Republicans engaged in voter intimidation when they did not.

That gave rise to endless screams of voter suppression which were baseless.

The standard for what could possibly be “voter intimidation” when Bush won elections was set pretty low. Read this report(pdf) from the US Commission on Civil Rights, where it is suggested that the mere presence of an empty police car parked across the street from a polling place could be intimidation.

The platform of the New Black Panther party. Achingly similar to Louis Farakhan’s Nation of Islam (NOI) “What Muslims Want” Fancy that.

The Obama admin and the Democratic Party are in agreement with the New Black Panther Party on these points?

Photobucket
10 Point Platform
What the New Black Panthers Want
What the New Black Panthers Believe

1. We want freedom. We want the power to practice self-determination, and to determine the destiny of our community and THE BLACK NATION.
We believe in the spiritual high moral code of our Ancestors. We believe in the truths of the Bible, Quran, and other sacred texts and writings. We believe in MAAT and the principles of NGUZO SABA. We believe that Black People will not be free until we are able to determine our Divine Destiny.

2. We want full employment for our people and we demand the dignity to do for ourselves what we have begged the white man to do for us.
We believe that since the white man has kept us deaf, dumb and blind, and used every “dirty trick” in the book to stand in the way of our freedom and independence, that we should be gainfully employed until such time we can employ and provide for ourselves.
We believe further in: POWER IN THE HANDS OF THE PEOPLE! WEALTH IN THE HANDS OF THE PEOPLE! ARMS IN THE HANDS OF THE PEOPLE!

3. We want tax exemption and an end to robbery of THE BLACK NATION by the CAPITALIST. We want an end to the capitalistic domination of Africa in all of its forms: imperialism, criminal settler colonialism, neo-colonialism, racism, sexism, zionism, Apartheid and artificial borders.
We believe that this wicked racist government has robbed us, and now we are demanding the overdue debt of reparations. A form of reparations was promised 100 years ago (forty acres and a mule) as restitution for the continued genocide of our people and to in meaningful measure and repair the damage for the AFRICAN HOLOCAUST (Maangamizo/Maafa).
We believe our people should be exempt from ALL TAXATION as long as we are deprived of equal justice under the laws of the land and the overdue reparations debt remains unpaid. We will accept payment in fertile and mine rally rich land, precious metals, industry, commerce and currency. As genocide crimes continue, people’s tribunals must be set up to prosecute and to execute.
The “Jews” were given reparations. The Japanese were given reparations. The Black, the Red and the Brown Nations must be given reparations. The American white man owes us reparations. England owes us reparations. France owes us reparations, Spain and all of Europe. Africa owes us reparations and repatriation. The Arabs owe us reparations. (Hey I’ll give credit where credit is due they call out Arabs too. Heh) The “Jews” owe us reparations. All have taken part in the AFRICAN HOLOCAUST and the slaughter of 600 million of our people over the past 6,000 years in general and 400 year in particular. We know that this is a reasonable and just demand that we make at this time in history.

4. We want decent housing, fit for shelter of human beings, free health-care (preventive and maintenance). We want an end to the trafficking of drugs and to the biological and chemical warfare targeted at our people.
We believe since the white landlords will not give decent housing and quality health care to our Black Community, the he housing, the land, the social, political and economic institutions should be made into independent UUAMAA “New African Communal/Cooperatives” so that our community, with government reparations and aid (until we can do for ourselves) can build and make drug free, decent housing with health facilities for our people.

5. We want education for our people that exposes the true nature of this devilish and decadent American society. We want education that teaches us our true history/herstory and our role in the present day society.
We believe in an educational system that will give our people “a knowledge of self.” If we do not have knowledge of self and of our position in society and the world, then we have little chance to properly relate to anything else.

6. We want all Black Men and Black Women to be exempt from military service. (Um you fools there is no military draft in effect. What year are you living in?)
We believe that Black People should not be forced to fight in the military )service to defend a racist government that holds us captive and does not protect us. We will not fight and kill other people of color in the world who, like Black People, are being victimized by the white racist government of America. We will protect ourselves from the force and violence of the racist police and the racist military, “by any means necessary.”

7. We want an immediate end to POLICE HARRASSMENT, BRUTALITY and MURDER of Black People. We want an end to Black-on-Black violence, “snitching,” cooperation and collaboration with the oppressor.
We believe we can end police brutality in our community by organizing Black self-defense groups (Black People’s Militias/Black Liberation Armies) (WTH? Black militant insurgent groups running the streets. Put down the crack pipe jackasses) that are dedicated to defending our Black Community from racist, fascist, police/military oppression and brutality. The Second Amendment of white America’s Constitution gives a right to bear arms. We therefore believe that all Black People should unite and form and “African United Front” and arm ourselves for self-defense.

8. We want freedom for all Black Men and Black Women held in international, military, federal, state, county, city jails and prisons.
We believe that all Black People and people of color should be released from the many jails and prisons because they have not received a fair and impartial trial. ‘Released’ means ‘released’ to the lawful authorities of the Black Nation.

9. We want all Black People when brought to trial to be tried in a court by a jury of their peer group or people from their Black Communities, as defined by white law of the Constitution of the United States.
We believe that the courts should follow their own law, if their nature will allow (as stated in their Constitution of the United States) so that Black People will receive fair trials. The 6th Amendment of the United States Constitution gives a man/woman a right to an impartial trial, which has been interpreted to be a “fair” trial by one’s “peer” group. A “peer” is a person from a similar economic, social, religious, geographical, environmental, historical and racial background. To do this, the court will be forced to select a jury from the Black Community from which the Black defendant came. We have been and are being tried by all white juries that have no understanding of the “average reasoning person” of the Black Community.

10. WE DEMAND AN END TO THE RACIST DEATH PENALTY AS IT IS APPLIED TO BLACK AND OPPRESSED PEOPLE IN AMERICA. WE DEMAND FREEDOM FOR ALL POLITICAL PRISONERS OF THE BLACK RED AND BROWN NATION!
We want land, bread, housing, education, clothing, justice and peace. And, as our political objective, we want NATIONAL LIBERATION in a separate state or territory of our own, here or elsewhere, “a liberated zone” (“New Africa” or Africa), and a plebiscite to be held throughout the BLACK NATION in which only we will be allowed to participate for the purposes of determining our will and DIVINE destiny as a people. FREE THE LAND! “UP YOU MIGHTY NATION! YOU CAN ACCOMPLISH WHAT YOU WILL!” BLACK POWER! History has proven that the white man is absolutely disagreeable to get along with in peace. No one has been able to get along with the white man. All the people of color have been subjected to the white man’s wrath. We believe that his very nature will not allow for true sharing, fairness, equity and justice.
Therefore, to the Red Man and Woman, to the Yellow and to the Brown, we say to you
“THE SAME RABID DOG THAT BIT YOU, BIT US TOO!” ALL POWER TO THE PEOPLE!

Whites are “rabid dogs” ?

Welcome to Obamanation.
Post updated June 6 2009:  With excerpts from Fox News report, Right Michigan & Justified Right.

———————————-




Digg!

———————————–
Related:

Obama’s DOJ Eric Holder Lapdog of the ACLU and MALDEF

Is Justice Blind in the Eyes of Obama SCOTUS Nominee Sonia Sotomayor?

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 5 Comments »

So the Attorney General of the United States Eric Holder is taking orders  from the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)?! (I’m sure ACORN, LatinoJustice PRLDF and La Raza are positively drooling over this news) Non-Citizens SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO VOTE IN US ELECTIONS. Why anyone should ever think differently is preposterous!

What a disgusting excuse for an Attorney General of the United States. He should be forced down! Immediately if not sooner.

And you thought the Obama admin was not transparent.The reasoning behind this flagrant flaunting of American law is as plain as the nose on your face. VOTES!

I snagged this from Greta Wire

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Matt Carrothers

June 1, 2009

Director of Media Relations

Obama Justice Department Decision Will Allow Non-Citizens to Register to Vote in Georgia

Decision Bars Georgia From Continuing Voter Verification Process

Georgia Secretary of State Karen Handel issued the following statement following the U.S. Department of Justice’s denial of preclearance of Georgia’s voter verification process

Atlanta – “The decision by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to deny preclearance of Georgia’s already implemented citizenship verification process shows a shocking disregard for the integrity of our elections. With this decision, DOJ has now barred Georgia from continuing the citizenship verification program that DOJ lawyers helped to craft. DOJ’s decision also nullifies the orders of two federal courts directing Georgia to implement the procedure for the 2008 general election. The decision comes seven months after Georgia requested an expedited review of the preclearance submission.

DOJ has thrown open the door for activist organizations such as ACORN to register non-citizens to vote in Georgia’s elections, and the state has no ability to verify an applicant’s citizenship status or whether the individual even exists. DOJ completely disregarded Georgia’s obvious and direct interest in preventing non-citizens from voting, instead siding with the ACLU and MALDEF. Clearly, politics took priority over common sense and good public policy.

“This process is critical to protecting the integrity of our elections. We have evidence that non-citizens have voted in past Georgia elections and that more than 2,100 individuals have attempted to register, yet still have questions regarding their citizenship. Further, the Inspector General’s office is investigating more than 30 cases of non-citizens casting ballots in Georgia elections, including the case of a Henry County non-citizen who registered to vote and cast ballots in 2004 and 2006.

“It is important to underscore that not a single person has come forward to say he or she could not vote because of the verification process. Further, while DOJ argues that the process is somehow discriminatory, the historic voter turnout among Hispanic and African-American voters in the 2008 general elections clearly says otherwise. (Stats below -VH)

“This decision provides a specific example of the inherently illogical and unfair nature of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. It is a sad day for the rights of our state and for the integrity of our elections. I remain committed to continuing the fight for citizenship verification. In the coming days, I will consider every option available to the state, including the possibility of legal action.”

Background:

As required by law and ordered by federal courts in October 2008, the eligibility of new applicants to register and vote is checked against the Georgia Department of Driver Services (DDS) and Social Security Administration databases to ensure that individuals registering to vote report similar information. If information in these databases does not match information reported on the voter registration form, the applicant is asked to clarify the information. Additionally, if the applicant previously reported to DDS that he or she is not a U.S. citizen, that person is asked by a registrar to provide proof of citizenship.

Prior to the November 2008 General Election, Secretary Handel sent letters to 4,771 voter registration applicants whose records at DDS indicated they were not U.S. citizens, asking them to provide documentation of their citizenship. As of March 2009, 2,148 of these applicants still have chosen not to resolve the question about their U.S. citizenship.

In the November 2008 General Election, county election officials reported that 599 individuals cast a challenged ballot because the voter had previously indicated to DDS that he or she was not a United States citizen and had not resolved their status with county officials at the time of the election. Of those, 369 ballots were accepted because the voter provided documentation of their citizenship after the election; and 230 were rejected because the individual chose not to confirm his or her citizenship status.

On October 10, 2008, activist organizations including the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit to attempt to prevent Georgia from verifying the eligibility of applicants to register and vote in the November General Election, including whether those individuals were citizens of the United States.

On October 16, 2008, U.S. District Court Judge Jack Camp denied the motion by MALDEF and ACLU; directed the State to continue the verification process; and acknowledged the State’s requirements to verify information under the Help America Vote Act. In his order, Judge Camp stated:

HAVA requires that Defendant Handel match information in the statewide voter registration database with information from the Georgia DDS and the SSA databases “to the extent necessary to enable each such official to verify the accuracy of the information provided on the applications for voter registration.”

Judge Camp also stated:

Since the possibility of fraudulent and inaccurate voting could significantly injure and diminish the public’s respect and confidence in the electoral process, the State’s ability to maintain reliable voter lists is paramount to a temporary and minor inconvenience to a few individuals.

On October 27, 2008, a U.S. District Court three-judge panel again directed the State to continue its voter registration verification process and challenge ballot procedures through the November General Election.

The 2008 elections were the largest in Georgia’s history, featuring record turnout among minority voters with the citizenship verification program in place. The figures below represent voter turnout statistics among Hispanic/Latino, African-American and White voters from the 2004 and 2008 General Elections.

Voter Demographic

2004 Total Number of Votes Cast

2008 Total Number of Votes Cast

Percentage Increase in Votes Cast

Hispanic/Latino

18,000

43,000

140%

African-American

834,000

1.2 million

42%

White

2.3 million

2.5 million

8%

————————————-

TweetIt from HubSpot


Digg!

————————————-

Also see:

New Black Panther Philly Polling Station Intimidation Thug Jerry Jackson Official Dem Party Rep.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »