“By using the excuse of not upsetting anyone, the politically correct are demanding that people behave like the fool who would please everyone; that everyone must become such a fool! All must accept the notions of the Politically Correct as truth, or else! This is the same mentality that inspired the Inquisition and forced Galileo to recant; the same mentality that inspired the Nazis and obtained the Holocaust. Once expression gets placed in a straitjacket of official truth, then the madness that occurs in all totalitarian states is obtained. Life, in private and public, becomes a meaningless charade where delusion thrives and terror rules.” Political correctness –Philip Atkinson
This is a MUST SEE video!
The History of Political Correctness Parts 1-3 Embedded video
Both communism and the New Left are alive and thriving here in America. They favor code words: tolerance, social justice, economic justice, peace, reproductive rights, sex education and safe sex, safe schools, inclusion, diversity, and sensitivity. All together, this is Cultural Marxism disguised as multiculturalism.
1. Materialism is not about matter, but about suppressing ideas. 2. Communism is not about common wealth, but about depriving people of any personal possessions. 3. Socialism is not about society, but about depriving people of the means of production. 4. Human rights are not personal rights, but collective obligations. 5. Tolerance is not about mutual respect, but about the prohibition of opinions. 6. Multiculturalism is not about cultures, but about the repudiation of nationhood. 7. Energy policy is not about the distribution of energy, but about cutting off energy supplies. 8. Health care is not about health, but about control of our consumption. 9. Family planning is not about families, but about abortions. 10. Self-loathing is not about repentance, but about depriving others of their moral foundation.
Whenever they start by improving something, they finish by depriving people of it.
If you do not think much of the above (if not all) does not fit in with Barack Obama’s agenda, you are kidding your self. Open your eyes and see things how they really are and not as they want you to.
The more the Marxist ‘cult of victimology’ push, the more America gives in. And the more control “some” gain while the rest of us lose our freedoms. It is getting to where, you can’t say anything. Unless you are one of the select ‘victims’, or a leftie liberal bullshit artist, particularly those in the media. No need to apply. For it is an exclusive club, not just ‘anyone’ can become a member.
The Obama Administration has drawn a line in the sand that is beyond contempt and quite frankly beneath the dignity of the office.
Such tactics may not be frowned upon by brass-knuckle operatives working for the political machine in a one party town. But it’s different when you’re the President of the United States. Most Americans of all political stripes don’t want to see the President using the majesty and power of his office for heavy handed attacks on any organization simply because it has been critical of the President.
In other words, the White House’s strategy may be the Chicago way, but it isn’t the American way.
Obama’s Chicago imports flack David Axelrod and thug Rham Emanuel parrot Anita Dunn’s ‘FOX is not news’.
Embedded videos
STEPHANOPOULOS: Final question. Your colleague, Anita Dunn, told the New York Times this week that Fox News was undertaking a war against the White House and said the White House would treat Fox the way we would an opponent. Here’s what Rupert Murdoch had to say about that.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
RUPERT MURDOCH, NEWSCORP: There were some strong remarks coming out of the White House about one or two of the commentators on Fox News. And all I can tell you is it has tremendously increased their ratings.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
STEPHANOPOULOS: That does seem to be true. Are you worried that your strategy is fortifying your enemy?
AXELROD: Well, I don’t — you know, I’m not concerned. Mr. Murdoch has a — has a talent for making money, and I understand that their programming is geared toward making money. All — the only argument Anita was making is that they’re not really a news station, if you watch — even – it’s not just their commentators, but a lot of their news programming, it’s really not news. It’s pushing a point of view.
And the bigger thing is that other news organizations, like yours, ought not to treat them that way, and we’re not going to treat them that way. We’re going to appear on their shows. We’re going to participate, but understanding that they represent a point of view.
It’s not so much a conflict with Fox News. But unlike I suppose the way to look at it, the way the President looks at it and we look at it, it’s not a news organization so much as it has a perspective. And that’s a different take. And more importantly is not have the CNNs and the others in the world, basically be led and following Fox as what they’re trying to do as legitimate news organization in the sense of both sides and a sense of valued opinion.
I suspect this attack against FOX News is likely not only an attempt to suppress dissent but a handy distraction to avert America’s eyes from the agenda behind the agenda.
Lloyd is in fact a Saul Alinsky disciple. In his 2006 book entitled Prologue to a Farce: Communication and Democracy in America, he calls for an all-out “confrontational movement” against private media. He wants leftist activists – through incessant political pressure – and the government – through the creation of a totally untenable operating environment of fees, fines and regulations – to work together to force the commercial broadcasters out, to be replaced by public broadcasters.
And in his tome, Lloyd had this to say about the First Amendment:
“It should be clear by now that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press. This freedom is all too often an exaggeration. At the very least, blind references to freedom of speech or the press serve as a distraction from the critical examination of other communications policies.
“[T]he purpose of free speech is warped to protect global corporations and block rules that would promote democratic governance.”
…and glorifies Hugo Chavez’ ‘Incredible…Democratic Revolution’…
“In Venezuela, with Chavez, is really an incredible revolution - a democratic revolution. To begin to put in place things that are going to have an impact on the people of Venezuela.
“The property owners and the folks who then controlled the media in Venezuela rebelled – worked, frankly, with folks here in the U.S. government- worked to oust him. But he came back with another revolution, and then Chavez began to take very seriously the media in his country.
Proof positive the Dems will stoop to anything to keep their propaganda on track…
But seriously just who in the hell do they think they are? This is unacceptable!
GOP Not Allowed to Say ‘Government-Run Healthcare’ – Human Events
Rep. John Carter (R-Texas), the secretary of the House Republican Conference and a former District Court Judge, is having his messages to constituents censored by Democrats on the Franking Commission. Republicans are no longer allowed to use the words “government run health care” in the communications to their constituents.
……
“What we proposed as language was as follows, ‘House Democrats unveiled a government-run health care plan,’” Carter said. “Our response from Franking was, ‘You cannot use that language. You must use, ‘The House majority unveiled a public option health care plan,’
The bipartisan Commission on Congressional Mailing Standards or the “Franking Commission” was established to issue regulations governing use of the franking privilege; provide guidance in connection with mailings; and to act as a quasi-judicial body for the disposition of formal complaints against Members of Congress who have allegedly violated franking laws or regulations.
Members
Democrats
Rep. Mike Capuano, (MA-8), Chairman
Rep. Artur Davis, (AL-7)
Rep. Brad Sherman, (CA-27)
Republicans
Rep. Vern Ehlers, (MI-3)
Rep. Kevin McCarthy, (CA-22)
Rep. Tom Price, (GA-6)
Pursuant to Public Law 93-191, the bipartisan Commission on Congressional Mailing Standards or the “Franking Commission” has a three fold mandate: (1) to issue regulations governing the proper use of the franking privilege; (2) to provide guidance in connection with mailings; (3) to act as a quasi-judicial body for the disposition of formal complaints against Members of Congress who have allegedly violated franking laws or regulations.
I don’t really know what more to say. I don’t know if there’s even a process of appeal on obviously partisan decisions by this supposedly bi-partisan, independent body. But there certainly should be if there’s not
Conservative girl next door. I am a pissed off red head.
Fear my wrath, or come along for the ride. Choose your side.
Free will, truth and the freedom of speech are my weapons of choice.
"...But if a believer demands that I, as a nonbeliever, observe his taboos in the public domain, he is not asking for my respect, but for my submission. And that is incompatible with a secular democracy."
- Flemming Rose
"lan astaslem"
I will not submit.
I will not surrender.
A Refresher Course...For Those In Denial
"Above all, the devil cannot stand to be mocked" - C.S.Lewis
The more the Marxist ‘cult of victimology’ push, the more America gives in. And the more control “some” gain while the rest of us lose our freedoms. It is getting to where, you can’t say anything. Unless you are one of the select ‘victims’, or a leftie liberal bullshit artist, particularly those in the media. No need to apply. For it is an exclusive club, not just ‘anyone’ can become a member.
Entries (RSS)