Posts Tagged “federal tax dollars”

Dancing With The Star of ACORN


Link @YouTube


Link @YouTube

Transcript:

CHRIS WALLACE, HOST: As you may have heard by now, President Obama decided to do five Sunday shows today, but the White House made it clear they had no interest in talking to us. We’ll have more on that later.

But first, the nation’s biggest community organizing group, known as ACORN, was caught in a hidden camera sting, then saw both houses of Congress vote to cut federal funding.

We’re joined today by ACORN’s CEO, Bertha Lewis, and by one of its toughest critics, Congressman Darrell Issa.

And we welcome both of you to “FOX News Sunday.”

BERTHA LEWIS, ACORN CEO: Thank you, Chris.

REP. DARRELL ISSA, R-CALIF.: Thank you, Chris.

WALLACE: Ms. Lewis, when those videos of ACORN workers who were helping what they thought were a pimp and a prostitute first came out, you said the following — and let’s put it up: “We are their Willie Horton for 2009. We are the bogeyman for the right wing and its echo chamber.”

Now the vast majority of Democrats in the House and the Senate have voted to cut funding for ACORN. Can you still say this is just about race and politics?

LEWIS: Well, we are the largest community organization of low- and moderate-income folks and mostly people of color. And of course, any organization is not entirely perfect.

I think Congress, you know, will be looking at doing an anti-ACORN amendment and just singling out one organization, but we continue to make sure that all of our employees — if they’re too stupid to understand that they are not reaching professional standards, we terminate them.

And we actually make sure that, you know, what we do internally is serving our constituents: 500,000 poor black and brown, Asian and white people in this country. So I was outraged by it. Everyone should be. And I can understand how the Congress was also.

WALLACE: Well, Congressman Issa, it’s not just the videos. In July the Republican staff, your staff on the Government Oversight and — or, rather, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reforms, issued an 88-page report in which you charge the following: “Acorn has committed investment fraud, deprived the public of its right to honest services, and engaged in a racketeering enterprise affecting interstate commerce.”

Briefly, explain why you think ACORN is a criminal organization.

ISSA: Well, one thing they did was they covered up an embezzlement, both internally and externally, and then glossed over the dollars, and the…

WALLACE: This was an embezzlement by the brother of the founder back in 1999 and 2000 of almost a million dollars.

ISSA: Of almost a million dollars.

Basically, the founder stayed on the board until this became public eight years later. Now he’s with affiliates doing the same work and able to say well, he’s not with the company.

The bottom line is there’s no transparency in ACORN. Any charity that you would look at — and we’ve looked at them in our committee. It’s a regular part of what we do. You normally find out who’s paid what, where the money goes, what the collection costs are and so on.

Here we have literally hundreds of organizations tied under the ACORN umbrella, and you can’t even find out what their incorporation is, whether they pay taxes, who makes what or, more importantly, whether corporations within the affiliates work in different areas — political fundraising, getting candidates elected, voter registration, other community activities, whether or not those moneys are fungibly moved illegally.

WALLACE: That brings up, Ms. Lewis, the question I got most from our viewers in e-mail after we announced that you were going to be on the program, which was how can a nonprofit engage in political activity?

It turns out that ACORN, the parent group, is not a 501(c)(4), which would be tax exempt, but rather a taxable nonprofit. The Congressional Research Service says that you are the only taxable nonprofit that they could find in this entire country.

Is that so that your various subsidiaries can get federal funds and act as nonprofits, while your parent group can engage in political activity?

LEWIS: We’ve made sure since I’ve become the CEO that affiliates have firewalls between them. I know that back last year we were outraged that the board didn’t know about the previous chief organizer’s activities.

I’ve completely overhauled all of our finances, all of our controls. And he was fired immediately, just as in this instance with these tapes we terminated folks immediately.

Under my watch and my leadership, I will make sure that we keep saving people’s homes, making sure that people get paid good wages…

WALLACE: But — but…

LEWIS: … and making sure that our corporate structure is aboveboard, it is open. The “R” in ACORN stands for reform. And not only do we think we want to reform public policy, but internally let’s have some reform.

WALLACE: But — but, Ms. Lewis, if you’re so concerned about serving the community, obviously being a taxable nonprofit means that you have to pay taxes.

LEWIS: Taxes, absolutely.

WALLACE: If you’re so concerned about serving the community, why not be a tax-exempt nonprofit, stay out of politics, and then you could give that money — instead of to the federal government, you could give it to your community?

LEWIS: I think what you would also agree with is the right of the people to come together not only to petition their government — they have the right to do that. Poor people have the right to do that.

But you also need to be able to do lawful (c)(3) activities such as servicing the community, which we do. I think an organization can do both. Hundreds of organizations do the same thing that we do. We make sure that we service our 500,000 members.

WALLACE: Congressman Issa?

ISSA: But you know, in fairness, Bertha, I don’t know of another organization structured the way you are where they’re both a political wing, if you will, of the Democratic Party, and has close relations with the unions, and takes federal dollars, and takes charity money, and does not disclose in a way in which anybody — your donors, the government when they provide money — can actually get transparency.

If you’re going to change this, will you come before Chairman Towns, a man who, by the way, voted not to cut off your funding, and get — and give the kind of disclosure to where the Government Oversight and Reform Committee can know that you are doing work with firewalls, as you say, so the American people know that their dollars don’t end up doing political activities prohibited by law?

LEWIS: Here’s the question that we really should be asking.

WALLACE: Well, no, no. Answer his question, if you will.

LEWIS: The question that we really should be answering — you have an organization such as ours that absolutely pays its taxes (Orly? Explain this Bertha) and absolutely provides its services. It has firewalls up. We think it’s up to the Congress to determine how they would handle some sort of anti-ACORN program or amendment.

There are poor people in this country every day that we’re saving their homes, making sure that they have decent wages…

WALLACE: But why not go…

LEWIS: And so that is what…

WALLACE: I mean, could you answer…

LEWIS: So I think…

WALLACE: … could you answer the congressman’s…

LEWIS: … it’s not up to us. My job — my job is to serve our 500,000 members. My job…

WALLACE: Ms. Lewis, could you answer the question directly?

LEWIS: And that…

WALLACE: Why not go…

LEWIS: And that’s what we’re going to do.

WALLACE: … why not go before the committee? We’ve spoken about…

LEWIS: I have gone…

WALLACE: Please let me ask the question.

LEWIS: OK.

WALLACE: Congressman Towns, who’s a Democrat — it is a Democratic- controlled committee, but there obviously are Republicans like the ranking Republican, Congressman Issa — are saying come before us and explain, because it seems you’re merging charity, nonprofit, profit, political, non- political, and that it all gets jumbled up and you don’t know which dollar is going where.

LEWIS: Well, that’s Congressman Issa’s opinion. Again, what — anyone that asks us to come — we will do whatever we need to do to make sure that folks understand the work that we actually do and that we’ve been doing for 40 years…

ISSA: Bertha, but…

LEWIS: … that we’ve been doing and we’ve been doing it well.

ISSA: … Chris is asking a question. You’re giving an answer that your own counsel, Kingsley, said is not true. You don’t have firewalls. That’s an internal memo that your counsel is saying you have these problems.

And if you had those problems then, and for 40 years have had these problems, and the American people have put $53 million into your organization and countless other dollars of other state, local and charity money, the question is will you allow, at least looking back, a review of these things so that people can have a confidence that you have those in?

There is no God-given right for any organization to receive a grant from the American people. The fact is there are organizations standing in line that wish they won instead of you, and they’re giving us the transparency so we can have the confidence the money is spent only for the purpose of the grant.

LEWIS: Congressman Issa is right. You have competitive grants and you need to compete with a lot of other folks. You need to deliver those services. He’s absolutely right.

He’s absolutely right that his staff, who repeatedly talked to the lawyers at Harmon Curran that said we did an internal — a lawyer kind of privileged confidential document. They gave advice. Since I took over, I have overhauled the entire system.

WALLACE: Well, wait, wait, wait. Wait. Wait.

LEWIS: And we took our advice.

WALLACE: Wait.

LEWIS: And that’s what we’re doing.

WALLACE: You say that you overhauled…

LEWIS: And we’re making…

(CROSSTALK)

WALLACE: You say you overhauled the whole system.

LEWIS: Yes.

WALLACE: There are the videos which have happened on your watch.

LEWIS: Yes.

WALLACE: I just want to put up — there are ACORN workers…

LEWIS: That’s right.

WALLACE: … advising young men and women posing as a pimp and a prostitute how to buy a house and avoid paying taxes. Here it is:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

(UNKNOWN): Your business is a performing artist.

(UNKNOWN): A performing artist.

(UNKNOWN): Which you are, OK?

(UNKNOWN): OK.

(UNKNOWN): So you’re not lying.

(UNKNOWN): It’s kind of a (inaudible) ego.

(UNKNOWN): It’s a little play on words. But you’re a performing artist.

(UNKNOWN): Yeah.

(UNKNOWN): All right.

(UNKNOWN): OK? So stop saying prostitute.

(UNKNOWN): Got it.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

(UNKNOWN): Day one, you earn X amount of dollars, find another name.

(UNKNOWN): Find another — another name for…

(UNKNOWN): And don’t say that you’re — you’re a prostitute thing or whatever.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

WALLACE: I want to point out, because you’ve also attacked FOX, FOX did not produce, did not make, did not buy those videos. We’ve just put them on the air like everybody else now has. You were brought in a year ago to clean up ACORN. Is this the new and improved ACORN?

LEWIS: Well, what did I do? Immediately these folks were terminated. Immediately…

WALLACE: Well, actually, first you attacked us and said it was a…

“ACORN’s lifeblood is conflicts with targets outside the organization”
- Principles and Foundations of Acorn

LEWIS: Immediate — no.

WALLACE: … it was a political and a racial conspiracy.

LEWIS: They were terminated immediately. I know the sequence. Those folks were terminated immediately. And what did I also do? Make sure that we have an independent review, make sure that we suspended any walk-in activities so we could review what worked, what didn’t work.

In instances those folks were thrown out. I have an obligation to my board, to my members and to my other employees that actually did practice professional, good high standards. Those folks cannot work for me.

WALLACE: But why is it still going on a year after you took office?

LEWIS: Well, here’s the thing. I — as I said, the first thing that we began to do was reorganize our board, make sure that we had financial structures and controls, make sure the way our offices were managed — and in a — in a way, it’s indefensible what I saw there.

That is why I said, “You know what? We’re going to terminate these folks immediately,” even though I’ve been reviewing things and making sure that we look at an organization that has…

WALLACE: Now…

LEWIS: … 71 sites. In a way, this was good for us, so what it did was show up to us what weaknesses we have, and we have moved swiftly…

WALLACE: ACORN…

LEWIS: … in order to correct that.

WALLACE: ACORN has long ties to Barack Obama. He’s done work over the years for various organizations.

LEWIS: Well, you say that there’s long ties. (Obama agrees)

(CROSSTALK)

LEWIS: That’s a matter of opinion. (Au contraire Bertha Muumuu it is  matter of FACT)

ISSA: He was an attorney for ACORN on a couple of occasions, at a minimum.

WALLACE: You personally endorsed Barack Obama last year in a speech before ACORN. Do you hope that he will veto any measure that comes out of Congress cutting off ACORN funds?

LEWIS: First of all, President Obama was a young lawyer among many different lawyers that represented a whole host of…

WALLACE: Can I get an answer to my…

LEWIS: … organizations, just not us.

WALLACE: Ms. Lewis, can I get an answer to my question?

LEWIS: Here’s what we want. President Obama is a very smart, very thoughtful person. What he does is his decision. I would never presume to tell the president whether he should veto a bill or not.

WALLACE: He says that he believes that ACORN should be investigated.

LEWIS: Well, that’s his opinion also.

ISSA: Well, it’s also Chairman John Conyers’ opinion, and he’s asked his subcommittee ranking — Chairman Nadler to pursue that. And again, this is not Republicans. This is about all the corporate structure, whether things have been violated.

You know, if you want to have an independent investigation — and I’ve heard that expression used by Bertha many times — you go to Pricewaterhouse or Ernst & Young and you — you walk in and say, “I want an audit of our corporations. I want a — and when we get done with it, make it public.”

WALLACE: Let me — let me interrupt — let me interrupt you, if I may, because you said this last week that you would name an independent auditor by Friday to review ACORN. I looked at your Web site 20 minutes ago. There’s still not a word.

LEWIS: You will have that announcement on Monday, making sure that when we hit the ground running that everything is in place, because it is important that we continue…

WALLACE: Is it going to be somebody…

LEWIS: … to do that.

WALLACE: … independent like Pricewaterhouse? Is it — I mean, you’re naming the auditors…

LEWIS: Well, it’s not going to be…

WALLACE: … so some people are going to…

LEWIS: … Pricewaterhouse.

WALLACE: … wonder whether or not…

LEWIS: You’ll find out who that person is, and you’ll also note that we brought in things last year, new auditors, new financial professionals, to make sure that they gave us sound advice, which I’ve been implementing, as well as making sure that what you just saw never, ever happens again.

ISSA: Bertha, if I could ask just one question from the standpoint of the government.

WALLACE: We’re almost out of time.

ISSA: Before we — before we provide additional grants or make you eligible for additional grants, wouldn’t it be fair for you to demonstrate to the federal government, to the agencies, that, in fact, you now have those separations, so that whether it’s Pricewaterhouse or somebody else, will you assure us that that’s the case?

Because my opinion continues to be you shouldn’t get another penny of federal dollars until you demonstrate that those dollars are firewalled for only that use, and that has not been the history of the organization.

LEWIS: And I’m glad Congressman Issa said that is his opinion.

WALLACE: Are you willing to open your books up to…

LEWIS: I am willing to do the work that I need to do every single day, not be distracted, make sure that things that we do well we beef up, and things that we don’t do so well that we change and we reform.

I have to work for poor people. I have to make sure I’m saving people’s homes. I have to make sure that children don’t get lead poisoning. That’s my job.

WALLACE: Ms. Lewis…

LEWIS: That’s what I’m going to do.

WALLACE: … Congressman Issa, I want to thank you both.

ISSA: Thank you, Chris.

WALLACE: I want to thank you both for coming in and answering all of our questions.

LEWIS: Thank you.

Someone in the NFL should draft ACORN CEO Bertha Muumuu. Girl has got some moves.

Video H/T The Right Wing Chick

Previously:

Proof: The Barack Obama-Project Vote-ACORN Nexus
Video: Obama Rolls Over and Plays Dumb About ACORN
ACORN’s Extreme Left ‘Social Policy’
Breaking: Roll Call – House Vote to Deny All Funding To ACORN Passes 345-7
Video: Four of the Notorious ‘ACORN Seven’ Explain Why They Voted Against De-Funding ACORN
Video: ACORN San Diego Child Prostitution Smuggling
Baltimore State’s Attorney Patricia Jessamy Should Look Before She Leaps.
Senate Passes Amendment to Defund ACORN 83-7 – The ACORN Seven
Child Prostitution Scandal Continues! ACORN Brooklyn NY Caught on Tape Advising a Pimp [video]
Caught on Tape: Baltimore ACORN Enabling Pimp’s and Ho’s [video]
Another ACORN Exposed! D.C. ACORN (also) Enabling Pimp’s and Ho’s [video]
Statement in Regards to FOX News by Margaret Williams Maryland ACORN
Cracking ACORN: Census Bureau Severs Ties

Related docs:
ACORN’s Core: Principles and Foundations of Acorn
Census Bureau Severs Ties With ACORN
ACORN’s Extended Network
Letter sent to the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service from Rep. Jon Boehner, Rep. Eric Cantor and Rep. Dave Camp encouraging the IRS to sever all ties with ACORN
ACORN’s Hypocritical House of Cards
ACORN President Maude Hurd received this letter from the Director of the Census

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

ABC’s This Week 09/20/09
“I Didn’t Know Acorn Was Getting A Lot Of Federal Money”

The Obama Admin. tap dancing side show is becoming extremely nauseating.


Link @YouTube

Transcript courtesy of Milton J. Madison

STEPHANOPOULOS: How about the funding for ACORN?

OBAMA: You know, if — frankly, it’s not really something I’ve followed closely. I didn’t even know that ACORN was getting a whole lot of federal money.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Both the Senate and the House have voted to cut it off.

OBAMA: You know, what I know is, is that what I saw on that video was certainly inappropriate and deserves to be investigated.

STEPHANOPOULOS: So you’re not committing to — to cut off the federal funding?

OBAMA: George, this is not the biggest issue facing the country. It’s not something I’m paying a lot of attention to.

Riiiiiiiiight! I bet his phone lines have been on fire since the ACORN scandal hit the fan.

I know I have said this a million times but Obama must think we are stupid. His first mistake. Oh and of course Obama knew ACORN received federal funding well before ACORN was cracked open these past two weeks.

Now on the flip side if he truly did not, he is to much of a fool to be POTUS. But I do not believe that for a second. ACORN are life long buds of the Obama he was an insider. He is lying straight to our faces America.

Update:

REDSTATE EXCLUSIVE: A Review of ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis’s Rolodex Suggests Strong White House Ties

Previously:
ACORN’s Extreme Left ‘Social Policy’
Breaking: Roll Call – House Vote to Deny All Funding To ACORN Passes 345-7
Video: Four of the Notorious ‘ACORN Seven’ Explain Why They Voted Against De-Funding ACORN
Video: ACORN San Diego Child Prostitution Smuggling
Baltimore State’s Attorney Patricia Jessamy Should Look Before She Leaps.
Senate Passes Amendment to Defund ACORN 83-7 – The ACORN Seven
Child Prostitution Scandal Continues! ACORN Brooklyn NY Caught on Tape Advising a Pimp [video]
Caught on Tape: Baltimore ACORN Enabling Pimp’s and Ho’s [video]
Another ACORN Exposed! D.C. ACORN (also) Enabling Pimp’s and Ho’s [video]
Statement in Regards to FOX News by Margaret Williams Maryland ACORN
Cracking ACORN: Census Bureau Severs Ties
Related docs:
ACORN’s Core: Principles and Foundations of Acorn
Census Bureau Severs Ties With ACORN
ACORN’s Extended Network
Letter sent to the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service from Rep. Jon Boehner, Rep. Eric Cantor and Rep. Dave Camp encouraging the IRS to sever all ties with ACORN
ACORN’s Hypocritical House of Cards
ACORN President Maude Hurd received this letter from the Director of the Census.

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments 3 Comments »

If we allow Sharia Finance to gain a foothold in our economy …We will be financing our own murders.

pastorius

Embedded videos


Link @YouTube
Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy discusses the start of the COALITION TO STOP SHARIAH (www.USAStopShariah.org) at the National Press Club in Washington, DC.

This second video continues where the above video left off.


Link @YouTube
Best-selling author Robert Spencer of JihadWatch.org discusses the start of the COALITION TO STOP SHARIAH at the National Press Club in Washington, DC.

STATEMENT BY THE COALITION TO STOP SHARIAH
REGARDING
U.S. TREASURYS EFFORTS TO PROMOTE SEDITIOUS ISLAMIC FINANCE

We are Americans opposed to the stealth jihad being waged in this country by those who promote Shariah – authoritative Islams theo-political-religious program for establishing a global theocracy. As such, Shariah and its espousal of violent and stealthy jihad constitute sedition. We are determined to resist efforts now underway to create parallel Muslim societies and otherwise to insinuate Shariah into this country via its mosques, prisons, campuses, media, government and financial institutions.
Of particular concern is the progress being made to establish Shariah-Compliant Finance (SCF) within Western, and most recently, U.S. banks and other institutions that trade securities. Islamic finances leading Shariah authorities have made plain that they consider SCF to be jihad with money, financial jihad and a means of promoting their objective of destroying the Wests economic system and replacing it with an Islamic one.

Incredibly, in recent days, the U.S. Treasury Department has begun embracing Shariah-Compliant Finance. Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Robert Kimmitt has professed an interest in studying the salient features of Islamic banking to ascertain how far it could be useful in fighting the ongoing world economic crisis. According to a press report out of Saudi Arabia, he has declared that experts in the Treasury Department are currently learning the important features of Islamic banking.

…….The Coalition to Stop Shariah calls on the Treasury Department to cancel this indoctrination session, to cease its efforts to promote Shariah-Compliant Finance and to recognize Shariah for what it is – sedition – and treat it accordingly by banning its use in U.S. financial institutions and products.

Fact Sheet on U.S. Treasury Endorsement of Shariah Compliant Finance

Federal Lawsuit Filed Against Treasury Secretary to Stop AIG Bailout Financing of Terrorist Activities” -Society of Americans for National Existence (SANE) December 15:

ANN ARBOR, MI – A federal lawsuit was filed this morning against U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson, Jr. and the Federal Reserve Board to stop all bailout funds from going to American International Group, Inc. (“AIG”). According to the lawsuit, the U.S. government, through its ownership of AIG, is not only violating the Constitution, but also promoting and financing the destruction of America using American tax dollars.

The basis of the lawsuit is that AIG intentionally promotes Shariah-compliant businesses and insurance products, which by necessity must comply with the 1200 year old body of Islamic cannon law based on the Quran, which demands the conversion, subjugation, or destruction of the infidel West, including the United States. To help achieve these objectives and with the aid of federal tax dollars, AIG employs a three-person Shariah Advisory Board, with members from Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Pakistan. According to AIG, the role of its Shariah authority “is to review [its] operations, supervise its development of Islamic products, and determine Shariah compliance of these products and [its] investments.”

Of particular significance is the Pakistani Board member, Dr. Muhammed Imran Ashraf Usmani. Dr. Usmani is the son and devoted disciple of Sheik Mufti Taqi Usmani, the leading authority on Shariah financing who, in 1999, authored a book dedicating an entire chapter on why a Western Muslim must engage in violent jihad against his own country – even if Muslims are given equality and freedom to practice their religion and to proselytize.

The lawsuit was filed in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on behalf of Kevin J. Murray, a former Marine infantryman who served two tours of duty in Iraq. Murray is represented by the Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and David Yerushalmi, an associated attorney who specializes in litigation and is an expert on Shariah law and Shariah compliant financing. Mr. Yerushalmi also serves as general counsel to the Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C.

According to the lawsuit, use of taxpayer funds to acquire ownership of a business that intentionally promotes, endorses, supports, and funds Shariah-based Islamic religious practices violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, commented, “This lawsuit not only raises significant constitutional issues, it also shines a light on serious national security issues that our own government has created by direct financial support and ownership of a business that supports anti-American, radical Islamic activities. Make no mistake, there is an internal cultural jihad underway against our great nation, and I fear that many of our political leaders are unwittingly complicit in it.”

On September 11, 2001, Islamic terrorists, guided by principles of Shariah-mandated jihad against “infidels,” attacked and killed thousands of innocent American civilians. Shortly thereafter, the U.S. went on the offensive by engaging Islamic terrorists overseas in Iraq and in Afghanistan. As in the past when our Nation faced great crisis, American servicemen were called to action, and Kevin Murray answered the call. From March to October 2003, Murray – a U.S. Marine – was deployed overseas in support of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Yet today, Murray’s federal tax dollars are being used to advance the very cause of global jihad he and his fellow servicemen were placed in harm’s way to overcome. Shariah explicitly demands the murder of infidels like Kevin Murray and the destruction of the United States, which Murray took an oath to defend. Shariah is the same law that is used to justify beheadings, stonings, and amputation for petty crimes in places like Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Sudan, which Americans deplore.

Nevertheless, AIG acknowledges and boasts its promotion of Shariah law and Shariah-based business practices. AIG itself describes “Sharia” as “Islamic law based on the Quran and the teachings of the Prophet [Mohammed].”

In further support of the federal government’s endorsement of Shariah, the U.S. Treasury department co-sponsored a seminar in November of this year entitled “Islamic Financing 101” to promote Shariah financing among American institutions. The Seminar was jointly sponsored by Harvard University, one of the many American universities and colleges receiving millions of dollars from oil-producing countries to influence their Middle East programs, which are often staffed with professors who are anti-American, anti-Israeli, and pro-Islamic.

“It is clear,” said Thompson, “oil money is purchasing the sovereignty of the United States and whatever loyalty to America these greedy financial institutions, corporations, and universities have left. It’s up to the American people to take back their country from those who so easily betray its interests.”

The federal lawsuit challenges that portion of the “Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008” that appropriated $40 billion in taxpayer money to fund and financially support the United States government’s majority ownership interest in AIG, which engages in Shariah-based Islamic religious activities that are anti-Christian, anti-Jewish, and anti-American.

According to the lawsuit, through the use of taxpayer funds, the U.S. government acquired a majority (79.9%) ownership interest in AIG, and as part of the bailout, Congress appropriated and expended an additional $40 billion of taxpayer money to fund and financially support AIG and its financial activities. AIG, which is now a government owned company, engages in Shariah-compliant financing, which subjects certain financial activities, including investments, to the dictates of Islamic law and the Islamic religion. This specifically includes any profits or interest obtained through such financial activities.

An important element of Shariah-compliant financing is a form of obligatory charitable contribution called zakat, which is a religious tax for assisting those that “struggle [jihad] for Allah.” The amount of this tax is between 2.5% and 20%, depending upon the source of the wealth. The zakat religious tax is used to financially support Islamic “charities,” some of which have ties to terrorist organizations that are hostile to the United States and all other “infidels,” which includes Christians and Jews.

The Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, recently convicted for providing material support to Islamic terrorist organizations, is an example of an Islamic “charity” that qualifies for receipt of the zakat. Thus, as a direct consequence of the taxpayer funds appropriated and expended to purchase and financially support AIG, the U.S. government is now the owner of a corporation engaged in the business of collecting religious taxes to fund interests adverse to the United States, Christians, Jews, and all other “infidels” under Islamic law

Continued Thompson, “This lawsuit is as much about protecting constitutional principles as it is about protecting our national security and preventing another 9/11 – whether it be overt through flying planes into buildings or covert through appropriating taxpayer money to fund an Islamic cultural jihad.”…

PDF of Legal Complaint to Department of Treasury: Murray v Paulson et al

Now that you are all caught up, here is the latest news. Obama appointee Geithner has no respect for the US Constitution. Shocker! Timmy Geithner and the Fed tried to get the case dismissed before it even went to trial.

To no avail!

Washington Times editorial:

Excerpt

Regardless of jihad, there is no dispute that, as U.S. District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff wrote on May 26, “AIG is the market leader in Sharia-compliant financing, which features financial products that comply with the dictates of Islamic law.” It’s undisputed that the government, as a result of last fall’s bailout, now owns 77.9 percent of the “aggregate voting power of the common stock” of AIG. Furthermore, Judge Zatkoff wrote, “after the government acquired a majority interest in AIG … the government co-sponsored a forum entitled ‘Islamic Finance 101.’ ”

Why is all this important? Because in the case of Kevin J. Murray v. Timothy F. Geithner and Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Mr. Murray argues that if the government owns AIG and AIG extensively practices Shariah-compliant finance, then the government effectively is supporting Islam. That would be unconstitutional.

Mr. Geithner and the Fed filed a motion for the judge to dismiss the case immediately before coming anywhere near a full trial. In a devastating 16-page decision, Judge Zatkoff slapped down Mr. Geithner and company, allowing the case to go forward. The judge acknowledged that the government bought AIG only to stave off an apparent crisis.

The money quote:

He then wrote:
“Times of crisis, however, do not justify departure from the Constitution.”

Smack down! My faith in our justice system has been restored. Send U.S. District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff to the US Supreme Court. He is badly needed.

Petitions:

End U.S. Ownership of Sharia Business Now
5921 Total Signatures (so far)
Say NO to Shariah Compliant Finance!-Say NO to Sedition!
866 Signatures Total (so far)
MaxBlogPress Ninja Affiliate

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 2 Comments »