Video: Robert Gibbs Fishy Response to White House Request for Fishy Emails
Posted by: velvethammer in UncategorizedUn-freaking-believable! Gibbs accuses FOX reporter Major Garret asking about “Fishy” emails of having “nefarious plot”!
Embedded video
Link @YouTube
Partial transcript of excerpts corresponding with above video.
Q And then Senator Cornyn sent you guys a letter expressing concern about the tips at whitehouse.gov and what that meant, what exactly you were seeking in terms of disinformation. I got a statement from Linda Douglass earlier, and I assume that, just from what she suggests in her response, you guys are not going to be saving the names or the IP addresses, anything along those lines –
MR. GIBBS: Nobody is collecting names. This was — we have seen and as I’ve discussed from this podium, a lot of misinformation around health care reform, some of it I think spread purposefully. We have used on many occasions the Web site to debunk things that are simply not true. We ask people if they have questions about health care reform and about what they’re hearing about its effects on them to let us know and we provide them information to show that that wasn’t true. But nobody is collecting names.
Q But in — is it misinformation that in 2003, President Obama, then a state senator, supported a single-payer health care system?
MR. GIBBS: I think, again, if you look at the statements that have been put up on other Internet sites that splice a bunch of stuff together,…
Robert dude, the splicing a bunch of stuff together is no longer an excuse you should be bandying about. Do try and keep up will you.
No splice -uncut video of Obama saying: “I’d Like to See a ‘Single Payer Health Care Plan”
Transcript here.
…and I think if you look at the answers that state senator, U.S. senator, and President Barack Obama have given on that — I think we hope to provide people with a full and accurate picture, not something that only the words opponents want might to see.
————————-
Q Following up on what Jake asked about the fishy e-mails, would it be more likely to assume, Robert, that the White House would be curious about people who would be e-mailing them about things that they’d consider either disingenuous or inaccurate in order to keep in touch with them as part of an ongoing dialogue about their support for the White House efforts on health care — meaning you’re not looking for people who are saying things that are not accurate, but you’re looking for ways to always expand the number of folks who e-mail you or Organizing For America as a political tool to keep in touch with them?
MR. GIBBS: Well, let’s — hold on. Let me — I’m not entirely sure what the question was, but let me put down some fence posts in the speech. OFA and the White House Web site, as you well know, are not in any way connected. Point number one.
Reality check: Gibbs is splitting hairs. OFA Organizing for America is just the re-named BarackObama.com which was initially put up during his campaign.
I am glad I had taken several screenshots during election season.
An early version of Barack Obama.com’s header

The URL is still (www.barackobama.com)as my next image will prove.
A Google search for Barack Obama returns these results. Barack Obama.com is Organizing for America. Obama is the White House. So yes the White House is connected to Organizing for America. As they say, same diff.

A newer revamped header the Obama Camp switched to down the road.

And now that Obama in in the White House and the former BarackObama.com is now Organizing for America –administered by the DNC. I bet they are as thick as thieves. Same hornets nest, different name.

The new header for Organizing for America is still adorned with the Barack Obama official logo.

Nope the “OFA and the White House Web site, as you well know, are not in any way connected” Not at all. Gibb’s “fence post” turned to saw dust.
I wonder is up with the (’sun rays’? )surrounding the Obama symbol. That is new and way off base. Obama is hardly full of sunshine and light. More like the dark side of the moon.
Gibbs: Point number two, I think I was — as Jake vouched for the veracity of your statement, I think he will equally vouch for the veracity of mine in saying that I was pretty clear that we’re not collecting names from those e-mails.
Q He was pretty clear. (Laughter.)
MR. GIBBS: I like the fact that, like, Jake is the arbiter here of –
Q Well, I guess what I’m trying to figure out is –
Q Ombudsman. (Laughter.)
Q What I’m trying to figure out is why ask for them then? I mean, what’s the goal here?
MR. GIBBS: Well, Major, as I said to you before, as I said to Jake before –
Zing!
Q And the staff that you have assembled here is obviously very capable of detecting all sorts of conversations in America about all sorts of issues and responding and putting together briefing points –
Typical dismissive gibberish response
MR. GIBBS: — we get stuff about what’s said on FOX News all the time. (Laughter.)
Q I wouldn’t be surprised. I just don’t understand what the particular goal is of seeking –
MR. GIBBS: The particular goal is to –
Q — e-mail the White House about things — about this particular issue.
MR. GIBBS: Well, it’s to get misinformation and to clarify for everybody what the misinformation is. I don’t — I hope that’s not new. It doesn’t certainly seem to be.
Q What, the existence of so-called misinformation, or the White House soliciting –
MR. GIBBS: No, the –
Q — descriptions in e-mails?
MR. GIBBS: — the White House looking to correct misinformation. When you make a mistake in your report, sometimes I e-mail you; occasionally I call; sometimes I just throw something against the wall. Occasionally it’s all three.
Excuse me…you are hosting an official White House press briefing NOT amateur comedy hour.
Q You ask Jake if Major makes any mistakes in his reports. (Laughter.)
Q Never.
MR. GIBBS: That would be — let’s not put Jake in that position. But, Major, we’ve discussed in here seniors having a misimpression about what is contained in the bill. We’ve talked about all sorts of things that are misconceptions in here.
Q — all the thousands of people e-mailing the White House.
MR. GIBBS: And all we’re asking people to do is if they’re confused about what health care reform is going to mean to them, we’re happy to help clear that up for you. Nobody is keeping anybody’s names. I do have your e-mail. That is –
Q As I have yours.
MR. GIBBS: Maybe I assume that’s because I assume future mistakes, but I’m not going to say that. (Laughter.) But nobody is collecting information. Everybody is trying to give people only the facts around what we all understand is a very complicated issue.
Then why the rush to shove it down our throats?
————————-
Major hardball question #one
Q Do you know how many e-mails have been sent to the flag at whitehouse.gov address? And, secondly, isn’t the White House required by law to save all correspondence it receives, so will it be informing individuals whose e-mails have been forwarded that they might want to have a chance to correct the historical record about the alleged fishiness of their e-mails?
Major DODGE #one
MR. GIBBS: I, for the life of me, didn’t understand your question.
Q Is the White House required to save the e-mails?
MR. GIBBS: Obviously, the National Archives documents correspondence with the White House.
Major hardball question #two
Q So the people whose e-mails have been forwarded, they won’t be informed that their e-mails are being forwarded to the government?
Major DODGE #two
MR. GIBBS: Maybe I’m missing something. I’m sure you’re hashing some nefarious plot, but I, for the life of me, can’t understand it.
Yes, sir.
Q Yes. Thanks, Robert. Yes, just to go back to the 2003 video, and separately from any question as to whether those were mischaracterization of the legislation, President Obama did say in 2003 that, I happen to be a proponent of single-payer universal health care plan. As recently as last June he said — told the AMA there were some countries where a single-payer system works pretty well. And I just want to ask, is that the President’s preference, or was it –
MR. GIBBS: I think the President –
Q — has it changed since that time?
Just answer the question Robert. That is YOUR JOB
MR. GIBBS: The President’s preference on a health care plan he had an opportunity to outline, debate, and discuss in an almost two-year campaign for President from 2007 to 2008.
Previously:
White House In a Snit About Health Care Opposition – Asking For Government Snitches
Full Screenshot: Obama Administration Fishy Request For Government Informants
Related:
Obama is as Transparent as Glass
HCAN Playbook For Thwarting Town Hall Protesters [Full Text]
Tags: Democrats, fishy, flag@whitehouse.gov, free speech, health care, Health Care Reform, Obama, ObamaCare, politics, Robert Gibbs, tea party, town hall, transcript, tyranny, video


































Entries (RSS)